What's wrong with this picture?

Nbrosz is joking. He must be. It was a good one, too.

Retard, I used to think you couldn't take the Bible word for word. I used to look for the meaning behind the words. Until I read the "He spake in parables" bit, that is, which is clearly allegorical for "take this all literally."

Spaking of really old stuff, a guy over here just unearthed well-preserved woolly Rhinocerous corpse and a bunch of other stuff that makes paleontologists go "ooooooh."

 

Well, I don't really understand that sentence, it's over my head, but the "He spake in parables" actually is referring to Christ, for example, the story of the prodigal son, the faith as a grain of mustard seed story, and numerous others.

 

Useing Uranium 238 to than certain lead istope which is only make by U238
radioactive decay they figour out the Earth is about 4.5 billion year old and that the Sun is about 5 billion year old second gemeration star.
Our sun is than huge fusion reactor which is on the hryogern to helium cycle. Our sun will be on this cycle for than other few billion year.

This dateing of Earth age isnot and was not detrime by one test by one man but hundred thousand 's of test carry thought the world over than peroid of time by many different's people.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/South/10/31/ ... index.html

Happy Halloween, to the patrons of HoL. :evil:

 

2 days or 2,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years. We do not and can not know. Besides, that just goes back to taking the Bible literally word for word. (Actually the word is "quickly" I think..)

Anyway, I don't agree with the Missionary Baptists that preach the end times exclusively. They operate on the same basis as our media. They need people's butts in the pews, like the media needs people to tune in or subscribe. Those preachers do it for a living, and the only way they can get paid is to get more members to "come to Christ." That's a load of bullocks if you ask me. We can't "come to Christ" no more than we can save ourselves. It takes a divine Being to do that. So these preachers preach "Turn or Burn" and "The End is Near" as a shock value to get paid.

Now, I think there will be a time when time exists no more. I do believe in Christ's return, but I also believe that us mere men have no idea when and what it's going to be. So to answer your question DU, I can't answer your question.

 

I alway like the way that some Missionary Baptists say that if you believe the scienist that say Earth is 4 1/2 billion year old that you are saying that
God is than liarer. Well I ask God about this his answer was I never told
the writer of the bibble how old the Earth was or how vast the universer is.
They wouldnot the understood it anyway I told than what they need to know at that time. Look thought the bibble than one of the writer said out right how old the Earth was.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/11/ ... index.html

AGM-114 "Hellfire" missle-------->Hijack this, you fags! :minigun:

 

I meant to say that nowhere in the bibble did want of writer say how old the Earth was. As the calad to keep track of time was new. The ancient Jew did not have than year in their time measurement system until much later. So than the old testment the report of person living for 960 years are wrong they where 960 month or 80 years.
Why you cannot mix colours and white in than washing has more to do
with the chemistry of dyes. The unvirse is many time vaster than we thing and can see. We can see thought the space telescopes about 20 billion light year in radius. Than LIGHT YEAR is the distance which light in the vaccun of space travel in one year of 365 days there is no leap light year.
Makeing very decison in running the whole of creation is too much even for
GOD . GOD created scienceist principles called Scienceist theory's and law's which run the everyday affair of Creation. The Theory of Evolution is one Theory which GOD make to make it easyer to Him run thing.

 

Wasn't that what I said?

Also, no, you are wrong. Jesus spoke in parables. The creation was as it is written. Carbon dating could be vastly incorrect. How are they sure they are right? Also, how do you get shell fossils high up in the moutains? the Great Flood washed them there, and there they stayed.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/11/06/ryder ... index.html

on this page you'll see RELATED, click on the photo gallery of ryder. I can't finalize my opinion on this woman, in some shots she's absolutely stunning, and in others she looks like a pre-pubescent boy. How about some third person perspective people?

 

Nbrosz has a point about carbon dating. It could be inaccurate. Science isn't infallible. Since I don't actually know how to do carbon dating myself, the claims about the age of the Earth are kinda based on faith, too.

You should think, though, nbrosz - Retard puts his faith in the Bible and we all pretty much put our faith in carbon dating because we have reasons to assign the people involved a certain amount of credability.

 

It is a scientific fact that carbon-dating is inaccurate for dating beyond 25000 years. How science journals come up with stuff describing things that happened millions and gazillions of years ago is really beyond me.

Personally I'd rather put faith in a book that's been remarkably preserved for thousands of years (yes, yes, I know, there are misinterpretations) than some whiz-bang method of counting carbon atoms and interpolating the figure to millions of years back.

Can we get off the nbrosz/God bashing already? DU you may not like nbrosz's way of assserting his beliefs but your ways are just sick.

 

Yeah, enough about religion already. That and discussing the atomic bombing of Japan are two black holes of message board despair.

So, dragging this thread back on off-topic,

Ok, I will give you the correct opinion of Winona Ryder. She is HOT. When she looks a little like a young boy, she looks like a HOT YOUNG BOY with NICE TITTIES.

Honestly, though, I never got the whole "boy" thing. She never looks mannish to me at all. I've been into her since I was young, and she's aging well. If I hadn't been so lazy, I'd probably have been stalking her for years now.

 

Sez you. I'm non-committal on the subject. At this point in time, I have no faith in any higher power(s). Except Mother Nature, except that's more in the nature of a tenous belief. I can't really get my head, philosophically speaking, around believing in a sentient, non-physical being on any sort. Which means I think psychics are full of crap, and John Edwards shouldn't even have a TV show.

Well, hell, that's proof enough for me! I rescind my previous heretical stance and wish to join whatever crazy cult you're promoting! Actually, wait, I don't. While you two may be unrealised and unknown pillars of a (possibly non-existent) scientific community, I prefer to put what little faith and trust I'm willing to let escape in people who's spent most of their adult lives studying this stuff, and not in amateurs.

 

Ah yes. With Google, every Tom, Dick, and DU becomes an expert. I forgot.

When people are talking about carbon-dating, I talk about carbon-dating.
But you have a point there - radiometric dating is used now, not carbon-dating.

Of course, nbrosz, you have to realise that nowhere in the Bible does it exactly say that the earth is exactly 6000 (or 6002 if you want to be exact years old), or that God didn't create verything in the appearance of old age.

Hm. True.

okay I'll shut up already.