[Search] [FAQ] [Register] [Login] [Usergroups] [Members] [Rules]
[Terra Arcanum] [Forums] [Gallery] [Downloads] [Troikapedia] [Arcanum Wikia] [Troika Games]
 
Support Terra
Arcanum:
Good Old Games
 
 


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:00 am Post subject: 
 
Lord

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 255
Location: Not where you'd think
Wow! O_O there have been a lot of replies while i was away. Been doing my honours this year so totally forgot about arcanum.


Anyone know of a good open source graphics engine (for C++) which supports 3D model animation? The abilities for menus (input boxes, yes/no boxes etc) would be good too.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:36 pm Post subject: 
 
Apprentice

Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 16
An old topic, I knwo, but I never found anyone really showing any good reasoning how the sequel making thing works legally.

Arcanum is a game whose copyrights probbably belong to activision blizzard or something like that atm. This means they have the following rights:
Quote:
Several exclusive rights typically attach to the holder of a copyright:

- to produce copies or reproductions of the work and to sell those copies (including, typically, electronic copies)
- to import or export the work
- to create derivative works (works that adapt the original work)
- to perform or display the work publicly


Activision blizzard has the right to sell Arcanum, which it does. If any of you are wondering about the "to create derivative works" part, then I found this about derivative works:
Quote:
For copyright protection to attach to a later, allegedly derivative work, it must display some originality of its own.


This means that an arcanum sequel could be made because it is an original work. What can't be done is rewrite the code piece by piece and claim it to be your own. If you get copyright protection for this code rewriting, then it could be revoked by legal actions by the owners of the work which your work derives from.

Now, about the trademark of Arcanum.

Quote:
Abandonment of trademark

Abandonment of trademark is understood to happen when a trademark is not used for three or more years, or when it is deliberately discontinued; trademark law protects only trademarks being actively used and defended.



Essentially this means unless they haven't reregistered the trademark of Arcanum, then a sequel could easily be made without any legal boundaries. (EDIT: Apparantly Activision Publishing has renewed the Trademark so the restrictions of the Trademark still stand... :S)

Now all of this is just 10 mins worth of research. But I guess it has anwsered plenty of questions. Anyone smarter than me is welcome to prove my research wrong.


Links to the wikipedia articles I quoted from.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abandonment#Abandonment_of_trademark
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright#Exclusive_rights
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_work#When_does_derivative-work_liability_exist.3F


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:47 am Post subject: 
 
Lord

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 255
Location: Not where you'd think
@rist9 thanks very much, was interesting to read. I wonder if blizzard will ever make an Arcanum game?


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:20 pm Post subject: 
 
Apprentice

Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 16
I hope not. The blizzard universe is a far different universe. It would probbably mess up the whole Arcanum feel. I believe the only reason for keeping the trademark registration alive is because they can, cos they have the money and it would be a big loss if anyone were to make a sequel and not have to get their permission. Permission getting can cost a lot of money. Probbably more than the reregistration of the trademark.
I'm sure they wont stop any sequel makings but you would need to pay them the money.

Arcanum, despite being troikas best selling title, doesn't have the commercial success it would need for them to be interested.
Blizzard is just too money orientated. They have blown the game World of Warcraft so out of hand with the latest expansion. I haven't played it, but frankly, atleast I wanted to play the expansions before this last one. Its cheap enough for them to do the expansion and keep the fanbase in the game, paying the monthly fees... It still generates profit. But the creative values have far been depleted. Now WoW isn't the only title they have, but it shows just how much they are willing to mess up the game if theres profit involved.
Arcanums value is not in any way commercial. Even though its troikas most sold title.
I just plain hope they won't do a sequel. Even though I love both game universes, they don't mix well in my mind...

I hope this text isn't too ranty. ^^


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:29 pm Post subject: 
 
Lord

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 255
Location: Not where you'd think
You're looking at it from a WoW persepctive. I haven't played wow, but I have played Diablo, Starcraft and the Warcraft RTS, all of which were good. Blizzard could make a very good non-mmo with a world, characters, gameplay and music score that I like.

Wow is a cash cow, but I don't see them making Arcanum 2 as a cash cow at all.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:57 pm Post subject: 
 
Apprentice

Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 16
I have played Warcraft 3 and Diablo aswell. Awesome games, but still a very different universe. I was just making a point on how far they are willing to go for the money. That proves they care about money a lot. Which means Arcanum wont be on their list cos it has too little money in it. Frankly, I just think the arcanum universe is too different from the whole Blizzard universe. They could do a decent job, considering that one of the Arcanum makers is involved in the making of Diablo 3, but I just don't think that any game studio could do justice to Arcanum. Only a team led by the original makers could do it justice.
I would rather see a few faily fanmade sequels than an over the top Blizzard made sequel. The feel of Arcanum is just so very delicate and hard to recreate by anyone else. Only the team led by Tim Cain could do this I guess...


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:30 am Post subject: 
 
Lord

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 255
Location: Not where you'd think
I see what you mean, but I think Blizzard, if they did pursue it, would take the time to do it right. Arcanum has a very distinct style. If they played through the game as both tech and magical and taked to the Original developers, I think they could do it.

Although... I would like the original developers to do it. I don't want any time skips, just a continuation of the world with game play fixes, graphics update and more story.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:04 pm Post subject: 
 
Apprentice

Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 16
There are plenty of Fan projects aimed on doing just that.
I've only looked into ArcanumAlive. But there are plenty of projects like that one.
ArcanumAlive aims to fix the gameplay issues the original had. The game engine will be totally renewed and made to house better graphics and colouration and lots more. Arcanums visuals had many issues.
In all honesty though, I don't think the project is very promising. It is all being done by one person. Which is very limiting. I am willing to pinch in on that project with music creation, but since the project doesn't currenly have a clear horizon for being completed, then I don't see a reason to participate actively just yet.
Although I do encourage you, if you have any programming experience or the willingness to gain some, then look into this. I guess any kind of help would be needed. Even a 5% imput onto the whole would help a whole lot.

Anyway, currently I think the best bet for anykind of fixed sequel or whatever would be a fanmade. Even though anykind of fanmade project has pretty low organisation for the people who participate do it for free and to participate in such a project would require a leap of faith in essence. You may end up wasting your own time a lot...


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:13 am Post subject: 
 
Lord

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 255
Location: Not where you'd think
I know how to program in Java and C++, but I don't know what this guy might need coding wise.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: 
 
Apprentice

Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 16
Just go ahead and ask em. I'm sure your help would be much appericated. It might even make me want to participate more and get even more people involved. I have a friend who might want to look into gamemaking... Essentially I myself am interested in it but I'm thinking I should learn some basics before getting any responsibilities...


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:11 pm Post subject: 
 
Lord

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 255
Location: Not where you'd think
If you want to make as well as design, you need to know C++. Microsoft as a free version of Microsoft Visual Studio which should have everything you need. You should also look for some programming tutorials on the net to teach you what the bits of code are that you'll be putting together to write the game.

It also helps having an existing game engine in some form like Irrlicht or something. You gotta have something that can create a window and display stuff (which I do) as well as load 3D models, character animations and sound. If the game engine can do this, then what you need to think about is game logic.

Making games is fun, but you need a plan. What you want your game to do, the core amount of stuff you want to put in before you start giving the player choice, etc. It will, at the very very least, be an enormous amount of work. But once you've gotten started and can keep going you'll be creating te game you want to play. Just be sure to test it a lot with other players. It's easy to point out flaws in someone else's game, but other people always behave in some way which you don't expect. You also want to make sure you've tested it your self alot before if gets to them, to make it's the game you want to play and plays like you pictured it in your head at the begining.

I was actually starting on a game a few weeks ago but then got distracted and forgot about it :S I should probably do some of that, will help rebuild some of my programming and games knowledge and I might even be able to use it in the future to help that guy. Who knows


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: 
 
Apprentice

Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 16
I recently procured the Gamebryo lightspeed and Maya. Gonna try em out and see what happens. I've heard Gamebryo doesn't support visual studio. Plus I don't really think I want to get into C++ just yet. Maybe I'll check it out someday, but it would be wise to take this step by step. I'm gonna look into Maya first and then start figuring out stuff as I go along from there.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:18 am Post subject: 
 
Lord

Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 255
Location: Not where you'd think
Gamebyro? Don't know that one. I'm using a windows pc.

If you do use a platform that can support it, C++ isn't hard to do and once you've learnt it, Java and C# are pretty much the same with slight differences as is, well almost any object orientated language.

I haven't used Maya myself but I hear it's similar to 3DS Max which I used throughout my degree. I only wish Autodesk gave out student or non-professional prices for their products. I don't want to spend $5000+ initially then $1000+ each year for no product improvement :S


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:26 am Post subject: 
 
Apprentice

Joined: Feb 26, 2012
Posts: 16
Gamebryo Lightspeed would be a gamemaking engine...^^ not an OS. Gamebryo was used to make for example, skyrim or civ 4/5...

And I wouldn't even ever pay that kind of money unless I would require to get my licensing together to release the game or something like that. But for now its just a dabble in that area. Nothing clearly formed.
Which is why I said "procured" which has a shady meaning to it.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:10 pm Post subject: 
 
Technological Marvel
User avatar

Joined: Jul 19, 2009
Posts: 898
Location: In an icy cave far to the south, feasting on human flesh.
C++ is hard. You are kidding yourself if you think otherwise.

It might be easy learn the basics but getting it right is a whole other kettle of fish. As with all things -- if you are going to do something do it properly. Half assing it will only come back and bite you later. If one if my employees came forward with a half written memory leaking POS I would beat them bloody.

My advice to you -- if you are still pursuing this -- would be to look at something like Python if you really want to start from scratch or something like FIFE if you are happy to modify another project.

I would also stay the hell away from pirate software for any project that could be released to the public; even just for testing. Get used to working with free tools. They will do everything you need them to and then some.

GIMP is my image editor of choice instead of Photoshop.
Blender and Wings3D are popular model editors.
NetBeans, Ecllipse, Visual Studio Express, Aptana are good IDE's you can use.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:15 am Post subject: 
 
Untrained

Joined: Mar 7, 2013
Posts: 1
Location: chengdu
Arcanum's combat design has received criticism, with reviews stating that it is poorly balanced,


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 10:35 am Post subject:  Re:
 
Expert

Joined: Mar 22, 2013
Posts: 57
zentaifan wrote:
Arcanum's combat design has received criticism, with reviews stating that it is poorly balanced,


Probably because it is true. Mages and melee are way too hardcore. Arcanum was (and is) one of best RPGs ever made in terms of story, quest design and setting, but honestly the combat of it feels like it was designed some third-party contractor rather than makers of game. Some of the crazy changes to combat (such as lack reloading, lack of different ammo) in relation to Fallout aren't very Black Isle like, can't understand why would they want to go backwards in terms of combat design knowing that they most likely still had source code of Fallout, since Arcanum engine seems so similiar to Fallout engine. It is strange really, considering FO1&2 had solid and fun combat, although it was slow and somewhat boring when facing masses of enemies. I'd bet the game would have sold more (somewhat, it's not like RPGs ever sell well, unless they're sex or hiking simulators) and have much larger cult-following if they would have ported combat directly from Fallout, even if it was TB-only and they would have dropped SPECIAL because of license reasons.

It's not something that couldn't be easily fixed though. If I had skills to to do an Arcanum engine rewrite, I would add reloading, multiple ammo types for both bows and guns inc. armor-piercing, possibility for weapons to throw people back, meaningful called shots (and limb damage), rework damage resistances in style of Fallout and probably rework overall combat into Fallout-style turn-based with possible option for realtime which would identical to turn based ala FoT-style (I know FoT was badly done JA-clone, but it did RT-combat with Fallout-system quite well). I might try that when OpenArcanum is released and scripting of it is simple enough for me, but for now I focus on just editing weapons of original.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 9:39 pm Post subject:  Re: Re:
 
Nemesis of the Ancients
Nemesis of the Ancients

Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 3966
Location: Sittin on my Back Porch, Playin' Poker with Cthulhu
NamelessOne wrote:
It's not something that couldn't be easily fixed though. If I had skills to to do an Arcanum engine rewrite, I would add reloading, multiple ammo types for both bows and guns inc. armor-piercing, possibility for weapons to throw people back, meaningful called shots (and limb damage), rework damage resistances in style of Fallout and probably rework overall combat into Fallout-style turn-based with possible option for realtime which would identical to turn based ala FoT-style (I know FoT was badly done JA-clone, but it did RT-combat with Fallout-system quite well). I might try that when OpenArcanum is released and scripting of it is simple enough for me, but for now I focus on just editing weapons of original.

http://www.qu-i-x.com/woulda.html

_________________
Image
Dark Elf wrote:
Racist, sexist, pessimist, chauvinist, misogynist... heck, I'm just ist.

Jungle Japes wrote:
And I say you sound like an idiot, not because you disagree, but because your arguments are stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:54 pm Post subject:  Re: Arcanum ownership
 
Expert

Joined: Mar 22, 2013
Posts: 57
Atleast I admit my weaknesses and laziness. :p


Top
 Profile  
 PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:18 pm Post subject:  Re: Arcanum ownership
 
Nemesis of the Ancients
Nemesis of the Ancients

Joined: Jan 28, 2005
Posts: 3966
Location: Sittin on my Back Porch, Playin' Poker with Cthulhu
NamelessOne wrote:
Atleast I admit my weaknesses and laziness. :p

Am I neither weak nor lazy. I'll have you know finding that link toook me a lot of work. :p

_________________
Image
Dark Elf wrote:
Racist, sexist, pessimist, chauvinist, misogynist... heck, I'm just ist.

Jungle Japes wrote:
And I say you sound like an idiot, not because you disagree, but because your arguments are stupid.


Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group