The Muslim Nation is More Worthy Than All Others

Well, I've been to many economically weak countries, such as Turkey, Egypt,
Georgia and Cuba. I noticed that people there are happy only when their conditions were so bad that they had no choice - it's better to be "happy" and poor than unhappy and poor. And congratulate me! I have recently took IQ test and got result 148, classyfied as "phenomenal". "Phenomenal" begins from 140, very high - from 130 (scale, as you see, varies from american one). I got previously only 135 because I did my test for only 15-20 minutes althought 30 are given. So now, I think, I have proved I'm not stupid if respected russian IQ-measuring site gave me a mark "phenomenal".
[happy and with smile on his face, Sofokl drinks coffee]. My English has poor vocabulary, unfortunately

 

You'll need to clarify what you meant by so bad they had no choice.

For now I'll assume the meaning and say, obviously no one likes being desperately poor and out of options. But if it's a choice between economic wealth and companionship, family and friends are much, much, more important.

 

Rich people have choise to do something - they can do it, that, this etc. And poor don't have this choice. They even cannot have enough money to do something in Internet or buy a beer. The only thing they can do in this situation is to be happy, because happiness cannot be bought, but you can become "happy" in every moment. What's better - to be poor and happy or poor and unhappy?

 

The answer is obvious to that. The harder question is, is it better to be poor and happy or rich and unhappy? That was what I was answering. It's also obvious that to be rich AND happy is undoubtedly preferable.

 

To be rich and happy is, of course, preferable, but it's hard, if you're not son of Rockfeller. And about your question I can say that different people make different choice - I think it's not objective. Some prefer money, and other - happiness

 

While many do, I personally believe that no amount of money can ever substitute for being happy.

 

While other can say no happiness can substitude for a lot of money.

 

Some people have never seen my friends and I on a Saturday night. Not having money. I would have to say the search for pot and beer when you have 3 bucks in your pocket is far more enjoyable than actually having pot and beer. Although both are still rather nice.

 

And some have not seen my friend who was unhappy because he has no friends except me. He was wealthy. But other friend don't cared about this.

 

Your friend's a loser. He's got no friends but you? Shame...

 

Bitte, sprichen Sie so man Sie verstehen kann! Du spinnst, ja!

 

i think that you are forgetting just that muslims are the best really, from the dawn of time. while westerners were busy drinking cows milk and killing each other we were creating civilization.

 

Oh boy, now there's three of them. Muslims did not create civilization any more than I created the Soviet Union. Muslims did not exist until after the Roman Empire had reached the height of its power. Before old boy Muhammad had his 'visions,' people who believed in one God were either Jews or Christians.

 

Dawn of time? You guys started to exist several hundreds of years post to the birth of Jesus. You have nothing to claim, because you've built no civilisation. You just converted your beliefs into the muslim and expanded. Nothing more.

 

Gee, I never thought of it that way!

 

You're clearly forgetting about the other religions Japes, but as this is traditionally a Judeo-Christian-Islamic debate I won't even bother going on about it.

The Islamics did do many things, the invention of the astrolabe, etc. But they didn't do them before about 600 A.D. Before then they couldn't do shit, as there were no Islamics.

Both of you pretty just admitted how close the three cultures are. The core of Judaism is in Christianity. The core of Christianity is in Islam. The only fundamental differences are the person other than God we put our focus on, i.e. Jesus, Muhammud, or Abraham, and our cultures. I've never heard of a religious war waged over culture before though.

 

So, all religions were created in civilization with another religion (there are no exceptions, because first was pagan religion of mother-goddess). Christianity developed in region of Roman Empire and Jewish territories. And Islam developed on territory of Persia (or somewhere in this region). I think that civilizations were created by people, because civilizations would have been created even when there was another religion. Maybe civilizations would have became different, but they still would have been created (sorry if you can't understand this logically hard post)

 

According to a study by the al-jazirah newspaper in 2060 the world will have a majority of muslim believers, the study also demonstrates that all other religions will have dissapeared by then and america will no longer be a superpower.