They missed. Why havent I heard about this on the news yet?

A phoetis may be self-aware but not for a while of pregnancy.

And how do you know this wasn't just a reaction to your sister's surprise. And please you dumb shit, don't post about how she wouldn't be surprised because you're a real badass who belches all the time. And besides, they're not nearly sentient anough to form any conscious thought. Oh and Sigurd, let me guess. You're a full supporter of the death sentence.

 

If it can't form a sentence, its fair game for abortion.

 

*Shivers at the horrible pun*
*edits post*

 

She wasn't surprised.

Yes, I belch all the time, but only a little boy whose balls have yet to descend would connect belching and "badass-ness."

How do you know?

Absolutely, one hundred per cent. The two are in no way related.

 

REally? You're against the termination of conscious life yet murderers must die? Oh, and Sigurd, could you just give me a second?
*fiddles around with testicles*
Well, as far as I can tell, my balls have descended. Unless of course it means something different, in which case I'd be grateful if anyone would tell me what it means.

 

Aliens are slowly extracting them for use in their experiments. Be afraid.

There is a difference between a foetus and a murderer though - the murderer made his/her choices to end up in that situation. The foetus hasn't made any choices just yet.

That said, I'm a pro-abortion choice person. It's not always the right thing to do to have a baby you can't support, because you probably then have to foist it off on someone else or have it grow up all fucked in the head.

I also don't consider it a human life until about the time it's born. I can't give you an exact time, it's more of a general time frame in my mind.

 

Of course. If I didn't think there was a difference why was I pointing out the hypocrisy?In my opinion, the death sentence is worse than abortion because with the death sentence, you're actually deciding someone DESERVES to die. Besides, what if they're innocent? Saying "We'll have to take that chance" is selfish, extremely so. Besides, killing someone because they killed someone is the ultimate hypocrisy. Not only is the death sentence unjust but it is not productive. You're killing someone just because you think they should die. It's spiteful. I also don't see how any Christian can support the death sentence, either. That's really fucking stupid.

I don't actually give a shit about this. I don't care whether people say it's murder, or killing a human being. Saying it's murder is just using a different word, and doesn't make any difference to reality.

I'm sure. If she wasn't expecting it, she was surprised.

You're really not too bright are you? That was an attack on you, your excessive use of the word "badass", and your retard "badass" attitude.

How do you know it can even think? I know it can't because it's brain is probably approximately the size of a pea, and that's not enough to think. Hell, an insect would be more sentient than a foetus.

 

Well, I am kind of torn about the abortion thing. In one hand you have the innocent fetus that has done no harm other than try to live and on the other hand, you have the teenage mother/rape victim that either unwilling or incapable of providing proper substenance and nurture to the future child. I think it would be more humane to kill it rather than live a bleak and loveless life. Thats why Arnulfo Arias Madrid (a great man unlike his bitch lover who is still the president of my dipshit country) tried to pass a law to sterilize people of lower income that couldn't support his children. The law fizzled obviously but he did have the welfare doctors sterilize said women whenever they had an operation. He was an Axis admirer so the policy applied thoroughly to blacks, jews and asians. I think it would be needless to add that he was the president victim of the most coups d'etat in his career in the history of my country.

 

Hey, shit happens. I'd prefer to have a comparitive few die and a whole shitload of bad asses die with them, than let them all go free. But of course, my hardline opinion has never been very popular.

You will all live to rue the day you spurned it though, when one of said people who should have been executed wasn't .

As opposed to killing someone because you think they should live?

 

I would never be a part of group that was trained to kill.

 

Hey, who said they would be let free? Life imprisonment is an option.

If I were in the army, I wouldn't be think: This motherfucker should be shot, I'd think: It's my duty to shoot him, and more importantly, he'll shoot me if I don't shoot him first. I would only kill someone who I thought deserved to die if I was angry, or if I was calm, it'd be to feel better.

Nope, if my mother was killed, I'd be thanking the killer for all that insurance money and inheritance. SEriously, there's no point in killing someone, as much as we feel we want to. I actually think the death sentence should be a choice, because I wouldn't want to live life in prison.

 

Then don't become a lawyer or insurance agent.

 

Or a doctor. Or rocket scientist.

 

Then don't go join the Military, particularly not the Navy. Oh, wait...

Death penalty is silly. In order to go all humane on their asses, it winds up costing far more to kill them than it does to keep them imprisoned for life. Besides, if they're dead they won't have to learn the consequences of dropping the soap.

 

I concur. Instead of spenidng so much money and time on chemicals to kill them humanely we should go back to the basics. Hang them with a rope(it doesn't have to be long enough to break their neck even) or bash their head on a rock. It's cheap and then we can make dog food out of them or something because the state owns their corpse!

Wolf, everyone's hypocritical for calling someone a hypocrit so it means nothing. The fact that killing someone because they killed someone is hypocritial isn't just irrelevant it's justice.

 

I think I love you. But seriously, a rope is definitly the way to go. It's worked for thousands of years, and the damn thing takes probably a couple hundred hangings (at least) to wear out. The death penalty would then cost almost nothing. Beheading is good too, especially in public. That's one thing I like about the damn Islamics in Saudi Arabia.

 

Beheading would definately be the most gruesome, but then again the most humane way to die. Although it may seem horrible, it's actually very painless, while most other methods, such as lethal injection, electrocution, and hanging, would cause the person pain.

 

Beheading is only the most humane way to die if the executioner is good and can take the head off in one clean strike. It isn't always that way. Ask Mary Queen of Scots.

 

The way we implement the gas chamber here in America is also supposed to be excrutiatingly painful.

 

Sigurd, ever heard of the guillotine?