The Muslim Nation is More Worthy Than All Others

What did you do the other 164 times?

 

So, it's your problem. My English teacher, who got "Proficiency" level in English, said it's grammaticaly right.

 

I speak English. Daily. And aside from the fact that I scored a perfect verbal on my SATs and have written for newspapers for three years, I'm also alot fucking smarter than you.

"Can you say it was your abstract idea to be in muslim country or simply that you live in Australia !"

That is not correct. First of all, you phrased it like a question and didn't use a question mark. Secondly, you're exclamation mark shouldn't be separated by a space anyway. Thirdly, you obviously don't really know what abstract means from the way you use it. Maybe you looked it up in a thesaurus, but you still have no idea about it's context.

Focus on the middle of that sentance, "to be in muslim country." That's missing a word or two. Probably you forgot 'a' between 'in' and 'muslim.' If you tell me it's just a meaningless one letter word, I will have no choice but to kill you.

Lastly, that sentence has no point. Even fixed up you're saying this:
Can you say it was your strange (substituted for abstract since it fits better with the context) idea to be in a muslim country or simply say that you live in Australia?

That sentence means nothing. Primarily because she made her point quite clearly, and secondarily because she never said she wanted to live in a muslim country, you told her to move to one.

By the way, you're English teacher can lick my hairy left nut.

 

Something that didn't not mean nothing.

 

I thought not harsh grammatical mistakes that don't make speech hyerogliphic transcription are allowed. By the way, you must put your, not "you're" in the end of your post. "A" is an article, so I don't care about it except when I have exams, schoolworks and olympiads. I know "a" means "some or which is not mentioned" and "the" means "that was already mentioned or particular". Writing "abstract", I meant that she thought about that but didn't has intention to move in (%^&*"A"*&^%) muslim country. My fault, russian specific word "abstract". So, if you have intenion to teach me grammar, would you say what "retard" and "kinda" mean ? I didn't find it even in Longman dictionary. May be "kinda" means "KIND of A", for example "kinda sort of fun" - "kind of a sort of fun". And nobody doubts you speak English (american dialect) every day if you don't have background "Mad Doctor". Reply please.

 

Kinda is short for "kind of", mostly used when talking.

Retard=Sofokl

 

Sofokl, stop trying to convince people that you're smart and stop whining when we point out that you aren't. If your english teacher is hot tell her she can lick my nuts too.

 

I never said I was infallible, I did make a mistake.

It's a sad thing about those articles, they aren't optional.

"Retard" is a word. If your dictionary doesn't have it, it's because your dictionary is a piece of garbage. Retard is a noun in this case, meaning a person who is mentally retarded. The root of the word comes from the verb retard, which means to slow. Mentally retarded means that you are mentally slowed, or in laymans terms, very stupid.

Retard also has the connotation of being related to a mental illness of some form.

Maybe is one word, not two.

Your definition of "A" is very good, but also slightly mistaken. I'ld correct it by using the word specified instead of mentioned. For example:

This is a book: The fact that the item is a book is mentioned, but which book it is was not specified.

This is the book: You were correct, this involves an assumption of past specification, that the book's identity was brought up prior.

I will admit to another error on my part, one I oft make; a lot is two words, not one. Canis corrected me on that one time, and I've been trying to remember it.

You're right, we usually let minor grammar problems slide. All your problems clump together and make your posts nigh unreadable.

 

so, grand merci, I would expand my lexikon with word retard as a noun.

 

Um, Blinky, could you please stop writing "you're" instead of your? It's just that you've done it in both your "correcting Sofokl" posts, and (apart from making you look sort of silly, since Sofokl himself corrected you and you went and did it again) that particular mistake is annoying. Really. It sort of... stands out in the text.

 

What, nothings... wrong with that.

Yea, I did it, it's wrong, but you can't stop me.

I am trying, honestly.

 

Try, Blinky, try. Systematic efforts would bring some result. Wy vil empruv aur gremar tugeser !

 

That would require a fundamental shift in the balance of the universe.

 

Balance is merely a state of non-extremity.

I for some reason think he asked me for a sexual favor. Pig.

 

nobody asked.

 

Wealth isnot everything in this world. Alots of people in third world nation that are poor are happy with what litter they have compare to wealthly america and european who have alots of fany toys and are unhappy. Haveing wealth isnot alway good for people and societry, first it encought people to be arrogent, not to care for they follow man.

 

Yes, but you imply that merely having things will keep someone from being happy. Nothing is innately wrong with possession. The problem is merely a placement of the desire to possess above the need for companionship. People are far more enjoyable than an X-Box.

 

But why there are more happy people in Europe than in Bangladesh ?

 

That can't be proven Sofokl, and you've never been to Bangladesh, have you? Can you attest to the levels of despair in those countries?