Spammer alert!

Do you still worship him now? :lol:

 

I simply have to try a different tack to get through to him, that's all, Ferret.

I agree with you CharlesBHoff. NewMax.com is a puppet of the corporations that pull its strings. I think that this discussion ties in very nicely with the discussion of politics that has been going on in "Your attention, please, CharlesBHoff". I would like it if you went over there and contributed your point of view to the goings-on. I hope to see you there soon.

 

How is this any different to all the other tacks you've tried? You just asking him to go to the same thread in the same manner. He probably won't turn up - he's never done stuff like that in the past. He seems to live in his own little world. :/

Have you tried PMing him? Spam his PM box until he listens. :lol:

 

I don't know. NewMax.com kept spamming him and look where it got THEM.

 

Do you want him to post that much? Could you stand a verbal slap on the wrists and an unpainted bedroom?

By the way, Charles, I think we got off on the wrong foot, 12-odd months ago - my apologies for whatever I said back then.

 

Good point

 

Cobra, you seem to be labouring under the delusion that Charles is a human, like you or me. He is not. What Charles is, no one quite knows, but as I'd define a human as someone with a functioning brain, Charles doesn't measure up. He claims to have a learning disability - that still doesn't stop you from running a spelling and grammar checker though, does it? I'm quite sure he has access to at least one, yet he refuses to use it.

Oh yeah, he's also crazy. But that's just a minor detail . Spam is simply his latest craze...past ones have been government conspiracies (standard, but more amusing than most), averting nuclear wars (emphasis on the plural), talking with God and tales of divorcing his lying wife, who tried to get him busted by the cops (luckily Charles is one of their best buddies which, now that I think of it, wouldn't his wife have known?).

 

The New York Time writer do have than bias, there is no just thing as than non bias newpaper, but they try as hard as possible to be unbias in reporting the new than just give the facts only. They bias mostly show up in the editoral and co-op peices where they belong. They just fire than reporter who make up some phony facts in reporting the new and they where not accidential. It you writing fact down at than event was happening you have than good change of getting some fact wrong than person at than event might give you than wrong name or tell you what he thinking happening. Courts historal gave reporter covering events that where happening more leedway in lideral or slander suits.

 

Translation, please.

CBH, did you write it like that to mess with my mind on PURPOUS? :-o

 

Approximate CharlesBHoff translation follows:

The New York Times writers DO have a bias -- there is no such thing as a non-biased newspaper -- but they try as hard as possible to deliver a story that is un-biased AND interesting to the reader rather than a basic recitation of the facts. Their bias mostly shows up in the editorial and co-op pieces and that's just as well because that's where a bias SHOULD be. Recently, the New York Times fired a reporter who was fabricating stories and facts on purpose. If one writes down the facts as they are happening one still has a good chance of getting a few facts wrong, and if one is receiving the facts second-hand then one has an even greater chance of getting a false story. This is why, historically, courts have given reporters covering events more leeway in libel or slander suits.

I believe Charles neglected to connect this post to his previous posts, and I have tacked on this addendum:

Even though the New York Times may not be un-biased, at least they do a better job at reporting the news as it is than NewMax.com. These are just a few of the reasons that I have changed my periodical and I hope you have cared enough to read this far. I'll now make my way to Chalupa Cobra's "Your attention, please, CharlesBHoff" thread to continue this exciting discussion on the state of media today. I do hope you'll join me there.

 

Charles is trying to mess with our minds so we should all become like him. He does this through very bad spelling. So that anyone who tries to read his posts go as mad as he over time. Chalupa seems to have reached far into the process since he can translate whatever charles say, therefore i suggest that we start a "save Chalupa Cobra campaign" on the internett and make people send us money. We shall try to save chalupa by spending the money on a trip to ibiza.

Xento you can try to make a webpage that can make people start sending money. When people says it is horrible we will just give them a link to second page that says; that if they send money we can pay for a educational course in webpage making. This course will ofcourse take plase in ibiza as well.

So, who is with me?

 

Screw that, just send all your money to me. After all, I need it the most out of all of us. I...-cough-owe my mom $400.

 

forget the chalupa cobra page, let's start a "let's get snowmane out of debt from her mother" page. so :thumbup: or :thumbdown: ?

 

:thumbup:

Maybe we should make a website that asks people to donate, and make Snow sound like an angel.... not that she's not, just.... ack! Forget it.

 

That's definatly a :thumbup:. Who knows... if I get enough money, I may allow you all to see my super secret gallery of awesome piccies! Dun Dun DUN! No, not really. You horny pervs will never see them.

Are you questioning my angelicalness? You're asking for a banning.

 

After "Dun Dun DUN!" it says, "No, not really. You horny pervs will never see them." SAVE CHALUPA COBRA!!!

NO! I changed my mind. SAVE SNOWMANE INSTEAD! SHE IS SO MUCH MORE WORTHY! (Not to mention beautiful, gracious, intelligent and humble.)

Last edited by Snowmane on Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:07 PM; edited 3 times in total

 

Of COURSE not! Why would I question your angelical..... What angelicalness?

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Alright, I'm done.

 

Come on, why not? there are some many gullible people out there and we should, as every one else, get a piece of the pie as well.

And when we are hunted down by a television crew in ibiza we can show chalupa to the tv and say(chalupa will ofcourse, at the time, be outrageously drunk) "he is not healed, send more money!" And "Xentos websites still suck, send more money!"

There are so many induhvinduals out there that we are bound to get the eyes of someone with too much money.

 

ROFL. I couldn't help but notice the sutble change in Chalupa's post. :lol:

 

Look at the very bottom of that post you mentioned and then read my signature for complete understanding.