Really, this is not a gravedig

uh, here's the site in question: Middle East conflict

 

Do we give second warnings?

 

You can't scare a bot, so he didn't flee in terror. And he never will. I would ban him, there's no sense letting a bot post new useless posts about Isreal here and there from time to time.

 

I understand you don't like that site, but isn't banning a bit much? Especially when he's not grave digging.

 

Don't worry, I hate him too!

But I'm wondering how he found the original thread, and then the one he had posted in earlier, even though it had been split and had a address, it seems like a really advanced bot. And if it's advanced, why didn't it post both those messages during the same day or two, instead of waiting this long, it might have fooled us then.

 

But he did it on several other forums as well. Finds the thread where his post is, quotes himself and gives the message with that link. Only has these two posts in each forum. It must be a bot.

 

I recall figuring that out first, all on my own, without resorting to that 'Google' thing you use so often.

 

Bot's actually care about politics and the Middle East conflicts too? Damn I must be less than human, and now robots.

 

Point there, Grimm Hatter.

"Google" thing, you say. Yeah, as I said in one of my posts before, you were right, but your words was a hypothesis, while my google research was the practical proof.

 

And now I'm off to Google "hyphotesis"

 

Well, hypothesis. I know I made a spelling mistake with the h letter.

 

By 'hypothesis,' I will suppose you meant 'divine insight.' It's ok, it's a common colloquiallism.

 

~cough~Colloquialism.~cough~

Polar bear's don't know how to spell proper.