Kerghan-lol

you have just explained the nature of evil. you should go for the nobel-price. I´ll see you in Sweden.

 

Well, that was rather thought provoking. Get out of my head, you!

Anywho, I still think "my" evil is true evil, though you did make me think things through one more time.

 

And if Kerghan is gay??

 

....

How can you be sure that Gabriel is the "man" in the relationship?

 

You got a point there. Kerghan is very maskuline. Gabriel is nothing against him.

 

See, this is why you and I are never going to get on well. You're pushing me to stand up for Gabriel. And Kerghan looks like a drag queen with that outfit.

 

Let's just define evil as me and gay as Gabriel getting ass-raped by Kerghan.

 

Yes, let´s do so.

 

Yes I also agree with "your" evil to a certain degree. If you are mentally ill or have a bad upbringning you might not believe your actions to be evil while others percieve them as evil. And if you don't think of your actions as wrong then they aren't, so it's not your fault, but instead your illness in the case of mental illness or your parents in the case of bad upbringing. Oh, and that feeling of someone being in your head, that's called guilt.

I doubt they would take a 14-year-old psychologist/philosipher (not sure which one it is) seriously (not like I plan on becoming a psychologist or philosipher or whatever anyway).

 

It's philosopher. And people who "become" philosophers are basically just writers who take mind-altering drugs of some form.

A person's basic nature must be measured from their own intrinsic moral code and values. This never changes. Certain specific attributes related to it may change, but the intrinsic nature of their morality is static.

Through various methods of their own and others devices, their mind can be clouded and turned away from their own morality. When this is due to a disease it is known as insanity. When this is due to a perversion not caused by illness, it is a form of evil.

Hence, evil is only subjective for a populous, not an individual. For each, there is both an evil and a good, and only one paramour of each. While there is a gray area, the shading of such grays reflects proximity to said foci extrema.

Thus the nature of true evil is to pervert your conscience into the belief that your course of actions are justified when they act completely opposite to your innate moral nature.

 

Whatever. But I still go with the other idea.

 

In layman's terms?

 

*le sigh*

What he's saying (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong) is that turning against everything you are for a cause or pupose is the truest evil, because you've essentially sacrificed your morals for gain of some kind or another.

 

Quite so.

 

I did Philosophy at High School and University. I'm good at this stuff.

 

I feel you studied philosophy. And I studied abot neirohumoural regulations in brain systems.

 

In other words you studied crazy people.

 

In other words you are right

 

Bah. Philosophy = Crazy People.