Japon population is in decline.

Yup. God exists because we believe he/she/it exists.

 

God is outside of Space-time relateship of our Univ and outside of all knowing scienceist law. He created the entire Univ and he have no phyical form and can be ether male or female. Arugmet than negrave prove nothing.
Saying bio science say there cannot be mermaid can be disproven by finding than male and female mermaid and all bio science text books would have to be rewritten.

 

Incorrect. Science and God do not relate. To use a quote, "Religion for Morality, Science for Factuality, and Love for Sancity." Religion covers the area of spirituality, and that which cannot be defined by scientific explanation, and science covers the 'natural' world, and everything that can be spefically defined (ie: a tree!). To say that God is disproved by science is incorrect, and to say that God disproves science is incorrect. The two are incompatible. It's like trying to compare a car's miles per gallon to a computer's processing speed. Sofokl, at this point in time, I suggest you shut the fuck up. You're egging Charlie on, and that's something only someone experienced in BHoffian Ways should be allowed to do. Oh, and my little Jewish comment was a joke.

....I'm feeling a little fiery tonight... ^_^ Did you read my response to that mathematical question? ^____^ I'm proud of that one.

 

science and God are completely compatible. after all, God created everything, so He created science, too.

 

Funny how Science tries to pull God down.

 

that's because science wants to understand everything, while faith knows that there's some things we'll never understand.

 

Then Science should hog the verb "understand" and Religion should do the same with the verb "believe".

 

That is primal difference.

 

You don't get it... science aims to explain everything that's in the physical world, and religion explains everything else.

 

Maybe sometimes it also explains physical world... If it was like you sayed, there would be no punishment of Jordano Bruno, because in your way science and religion don't intersect. Or, maybe religion takes too much responsibility on herself...

 

Charles, you already said that because we don't know what created the universe, it implies God exists... but we never knew what created lightning at one point and said it was God too. Is God merely a word for all things currently beyond the scope of human understanding? And the fact that you say yourself, His existance is implicit, does that form the basis for anything that should be erected in His name? Implications are not what actions or ideas should be based on.

 

Yea. And population of European (and, what's more, Christian!) Elvis impersonators will decrease rapidly... :roll:

 

In Islam there is no seperation of religion and science like in the west. The Father of Pakistian Nuclear bomb is also than religish scholar who sopport the law of evolution of animal and planet speice but not of human being which where created directly by God on amiminal and plants where indirectly created by God useing the Law of evolution.. The Law of Evolution is hotly delate by religious scholar and moslim scienists alike.

 

God does exist as the orderly universer wouldnot exsit at all, it would be diorderly if it created itself from nothing, that problem scienist have how something was created from nothing which fly in cases of many law of sciences which donot allow the creation of something from nothing. So the Big Bang theory is the proof that God exist and it God first miralcle.

 

Or maybe, God was made with the big bang, and he's spent all of eternity at the center of the Universe smoking crack with a giant talking beaver and a little Mexican man named Jon Havier Sanchez. It's all supposition, none of it can be proved.

 

Captain Kirk met God in StarTrek 5.

 

Blinkly you better be careful on the day of judgement .

 

Charles are you aware that people like you is the reason that religion exists in the first place?