Hey Look! We reached a new low, America!

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by DarkFool, Aug 23, 2009.

Remove all ads!
Support Terra-Arcanum:

GOG.com

PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online!
  1. Dark Elf

    Dark Elf Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,796
    Media:
    34
    Likes Received:
    164
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Me too.

    Valhalla is the coolest concept of heaven bar none. Loads of fighting, infinite beer and bacon, probably wenches too. And you get to die at the end of it, likely stomped to death after having cut the fucking balls of a troll or giant.

    Sure beats sitting on a cloud listening on the wailing of harps for all eternity.
     
  2. Archmage Orintil

    Archmage Orintil New Member

    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    You got a new convert.
     
  3. Dark Elf

    Dark Elf Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,796
    Media:
    34
    Likes Received:
    164
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Great!

    Now, shall we invade France, or shall we enlist to the personal guard of the Byzantine emperor?

    Decisions, decisions.
     
  4. magikot

    magikot Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,688
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Go with something that hasn't been successful half a dozen (or more) times... like invading Russia in winter.
     
  5. Mesteut

    Mesteut New Member

    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Don't forget that the Varangian Guard failed badly against the Ottomans, from Manzikert to the Conquest of Constantinople.
     
  6. Dark Elf

    Dark Elf Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,796
    Media:
    34
    Likes Received:
    164
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    That's okay, we'll just spread the rumour that attacking Constaninople goes against the basic tenets of Kemalism before we go.
     
  7. Mesteut

    Mesteut New Member

    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Did I ever mention you that the EU/US backed government here is trying to destroy Kemalism? You'll face a weird (freakish) angry Turco-Islamic hybrid nation due to incompetence or evilness on the West's part.

    A Jihad-happy one, I might add. No way you can hold Constantinople/Istanbul. I'd say you should go raid Normandy, and then move to England.
     
  8. Dark Elf

    Dark Elf Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,796
    Media:
    34
    Likes Received:
    164
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Nah, not sure if I should bother with England. The way things are going, I bet they'll be as Jihad-happy as contemporary Turkey within five years or so.

    On a more serious note, the growing islamism in Turkey is a fucking disaster.
     
  9. Mesteut

    Mesteut New Member

    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    What I don't understand is their support from the EU/US. I thought they were on a War on Terror. :/

    Well, our only hope is the army (or a political movement with common sense and appeal to the common - which I don't believe will appear in "any" country) right now.
     
  10. Ramidel

    Ramidel New Member

    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Mostly because the EU/US are back to playing the "support democracy" card.

    Nowadays, the Powers That Be would rather have elected Islamists than unelected military dictators. (In Turkey, anyway. America seems to have decided not to recognize the elected government of Palestine.)
     
  11. magikot

    magikot Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,688
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003

    Fuck that shit. Democracy just means 51% of the population can void the rights of the other 49%. I support pure laissez-faire capitalism.... to bad we never have and never will have such a system. So until then, federalist republic please.
     
  12. Dark Elf

    Dark Elf Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,796
    Media:
    34
    Likes Received:
    164
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Pure laissez-faire capitalism is every bit as utopian and dogmatic as communism, and would if implemented likely end in the latter. Wealth would flood to the upper echelons in society while sucking the lifeblood out of the lower rungs, which would ignite bloody revolution as has happened a crapload of times in history already.

    You understanding of democracy also stems from direct democracy aka tyranny of the majority rather than a constitutional republic.
     
  13. Mesteut

    Mesteut New Member

    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Agreed on the thing on Wild Capitalism. The best solution is to ensure access to basic needs for everyone and limiting corporations from interfering with the government (another step that's as important as the seperation of religion and the state for me) while retaining a competitive market.
     
  14. Xz

    Xz Monkey Admin Staff Member

    Messages:
    5,085
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    No Democracy actually is nothing else than majority dictatorship. Something which clearly manifested itself when Norway got it's first Executive branch with majority backing in the Storting.

    Worst part is that because a vote in god forsaken Finnmark is worth twice as much as one from Oslo, which resulted in the 48% dictating the other 52%. So fuck that.

    Also I'm a laissez-faire libertarian, but no that wouldn't really work in reality.

    Winston Churchill said it best - "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time."
     
  15. Ramidel

    Ramidel New Member

    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    America's definition of "democracy" has always been "constitutional capitalist Western-values republicanism that's open to doing business with American companies." Direct democracy would be entirely too independent for the tastes of the "democracy"-spreaders.

    And laissez-faire libertarianism could theoretically work if everyone played by its rules. That's where it fails; companies can and will use illegal tactics and even main force to control their workforce, whatever the law says. (As DE so astutely noticed, it's rather similar to communism in its faults, namely that those with control of the resources are going to cheat to maintain that power.)

    Interestingly, though, laissez-faire open markets are becoming more and more possible as society evolves, given current trends away from big corporate monoliths in Western countries.
     
  16. Mesteut

    Mesteut New Member

    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    One issue on that - How is having rules "laissez-faire" capitalism? Laissez-faire literally means "let them do (whatever they want)", as it's part of "laissez-faire, laissez-passer". Laissez-faire capitalism is the wildest form of capitalism available. Rockafeller anyone?

    Having rules would not lead to a complete free market, it would lead to government moderation. Which capitalist countries do need by the way.
     
  17. Ramidel

    Ramidel New Member

    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Laissez-faire capitalism, conventionally, does include rules against using violence or fraud. Otherwise, you're not "let be."
     
  18. Mesteut

    Mesteut New Member

    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Yet "playing by the rules" usually include lobbying, paying fake people to do "legal protests", creating fake scientific reports etc. - all the things corporations use to gain/use political power.

    It might depend on the definition of playing by the rules, however, if your system allows these, then it's bound to be corrupt. If it isn't, then corporations do not take part in the democratic progress (making it more democratic in my opinion), making government moderate the corporations' actions with law.

    Laissez-faire allows these, if I'm not mistaken.
     
  19. Xz

    Xz Monkey Admin Staff Member

    Messages:
    5,085
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    Laissez-faire allows you to do anything so long as you don't step on other peoples rights. I have a right to not be hit by you, therefore you may not hit me. I have a right to throw you off my property, therefore you must leave it when I tell you to.

    Personally I see the environment as something we all own and share - whether we like it or not. Therefore we all have a right to not having other people fuck it up.

    Also since in a Laissez-faire society the state would have to stay out of the market economics, there would be nothing to gain from lobbying/fake legal protests/fake science. As soon as the state got involved there would be no laissez-faire.
     
  20. Mesteut

    Mesteut New Member

    Messages:
    686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    But without laws prohibiting other corporations to fuck up the environment, there would be no need for lobbying. Only with the government moderation (like taxes on carbon emissions, which aren't enough IMO) do the corporations feel the need to have to change the law.

    The only time you won't have lobbying is when there are no laws the government enforces on things like waste control/carbon emission tax etc.
     
Our Host!