did you know???

Wow, when a thread on this forum goes off-topic, it really goes off-topic!
:wink:

pjm

 

Well Eros Rex, I`m sure your girlfriend wouldn`t mind the cast....


:grin:

- Zen

 

85% of statistics are made up on the spot.

 

I remember that happened on the Drew Carey show once...I am not a regular watcher, it just happened to be on before a show I wanted to watch...the medical term is Corpus Casa-something or other isn't it?

 

squish, did you know that 47% of statistics made on the spot are accurate :wink:

 

Did you know that you forget 85% of all advertising within 24 hours?

 

Did you know that the Russians and the Americans have had a manned lunar base since may -86. They have joined forces in uncovering a vast underground cavernous complex first uncovered by the astronauts who was with Armstrong. Armstrong himself was infact the first to recognise and uncover(dust,gravel and debris) an artificial structure on the lunar surface...

This discovery of the first entrance to the "lunar-tombs", led to a swift end of the cold war and a secretive cooperation between the Russian, American and Chinese space programs. The Chinese was squeesed out based on breaches in sivil rights in -78. And in -86 the first US/R archeological base was operational. In -91 China exposed the hole shabang to the world leaders who then formed the "The united worldwide comitee of Lunar matters" or UWCL.

- Zen

 

It's probably just some space junk that's crash landed on the moon...I mean, the moon has taken so many meteors for Earth...

 

Come on Jarinor! Of course the moon has taken alot of meteorites for the earth during the ages, but escentially It`s like standing naked in a bullet rain tryin' to hide behind a bottle cap...

Besides the majority of the meteorites that hit earth is disintegrated in the earths atmosphere...due to frictional heat.

And about your theory on it just being meteorites or "space junk" hitting the moon: I`d bet a trained astronaut could spot the difference between a sattelite and a fixed, external and artificial (as in buildt) strukture!!

- Zen

 

speaking of moon
ive seen this sort of documentary...
they have evidence saying that man never been on the moon some of them are very convincing now i dont know what to believe

 

?

Are you saying Armstrong never really was on the moon?

- Zen

 

that what they trying to say
the evidence that stuck to my head most is
being in space, should there be stars, cause all of the pics they have shown and the ones ive actually seen in books, etc, have no stars on it

 

And if NASA and USA were to fake such pics they wouldn`t have thought of that!?!

I find it more likely that the pictures are real based on such a notion alone!

- Zen

 

like i said i dont know what to believe any more, so it depends really on your own decision, investigate it your self

and another thing the race to the moon was a caused by the cold war, anyone who reaches the moon 1st, attains world domination

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Mael on 2001-12-05 02:49 ]</font>

 

Well, according to that logic, if Russia had reached the moon first, then America would have just gone "Ah, shoot. Looks like the Russians are kings of the world now. Guess we'd better go back to the good ol' isolationism policy :smile:.

However, I do agree with most of what the rest of what you said. There are some very convincing conspiracy theories out there, that have extensive evidence to support that Armstrong wasn't the first guy on the moon. I guess we'll never really know, because these days just about anything can be faked...except a male orgasm :grin: (sorry to all the kiddies out there).

Zen, my theory on the stuff on the moon being space junk wasn't that serious :smile:.

 

While arguably one of humanity's greatest (or most futile, depending on your point of view) achievements, it seems to me it was pretty much equivalent to the USA and the CCCP measuring their dicks.

Hmmm ... some kind of profound lesson to be learned there, perhaps.

 

Okay, call me stupid, but what the hell is the CCCP?

 

Thats USSR.

 

Ah, well, the Space Race was pretty close there for a while...then Russia ran out of money :smile:.

I think the only profound lesson there is that a communist economy cannot keep up with a capitalist one over any significant period of time...

 

Ah well, I've never really understood when why some maps say CCCP and some USSR. Also, since the only ones I have seen were British maps, I assumed the Russians (and other member states) had a different name for their country than the one we used, even if the initials tuned out to be coincidently the same.

Are you saying USSR is what you called it in Poland? Or are you saying USSR was lucky enough to have a name everyone in the world agreed on (unlike, say, Germany, which is called 'Allemagne' by the French and 'Deutschland' by Germans)?