Democrate won election.

It he said the truth the GOP wouldnot have being able to impeak him. She was 22 or 23 year ago able to give content to sex. I would have said She and me have than contentable sexual relateship with her willing content.

 

They didn't impeach him over whether or not it was consentual, they impeached him because he lied about anything having happened.
Other than that, I'm surprised I understood that paragraph.

 

...By not responding to any of the slaps in the face the Islamic terrorists gave us. The Kenya and Zimbabwe embassy bombings. The USS Cole bombing. The list goes on.

This was not "peace". It was weakness, cowardice. Dubya kicked in the hornets nest, and now we're getting stung. But it's simply the first step in eradicating the hornets. Clinton was fine with letting the hornets build and build and coalesce.

Did you read the news how the terrorist insurgents celebrated when the Democrats won these past elections? It's because they (the terrorists) KNOW that the Dems won't touch them, and will do everything in their power to neuter Bush's attempts to eradicate the terrorists. So, who's weak?

 

Well, I don't think that if there would be second 11 Sep., Democrates would just sit and make nothing. But at least they wouldn't have attacked Iraq.

 

The Islamist freedom fighter are in the long term winning the war. Bush want to invade North Korea after it nuclear bomb test the military have to tell him we lach the manpower to invade North Korea due to us being pin down in Iraq and Afghanistan. The chaos in Iraq is dur direct to our not haveing than enought troop in Iraq to maintrain order from the beginning..

 

One man's freedom fighters is another man's terrorists is a third man's revolutionaries. And round and round we go.

 

Yes, US servicemen died because of his inaction (Remember the Cole?), two US embassies were destroyed with countless people killed, and a Donkey at an abandoned terorist camp was killed by a cruise Missile. Then the emboldened bin leadin killed thousands at the trade Towers.
But nobody but me seems to rememeber that. Freaking pot-smoking hippies just dont get it.

The major news agencies are tools of Propaganda, especially when they are mostly owned by Democrats.

After 9-11 Democrats and Republicans voted unanimously to attack America's enemy's, but when the bullets started flying, the cowardly Dems started crying about the poor insurgents and how we have to protect them from our wrath. Screw them yellow-bellied two-faced liars. All they do is say 'lets get out of Iraq', but offer no plan on how to get out.

Yeah, lets just leave the place in civil war and let the place become a haven for terrorists and large-scale genocide. If we walked way the crap you see on TV would be like watching two teenagers beat each other up compared to the horrors you'd see otherwise. Like it or not, the US is maintaining a rough peace in the region until the peoples of Iraq can stabilize their own country, just like Japan after he Seconf World War.

But yeah, lets walk away from our reponsibilities and let the entire Middle-East devolve into madness and chaos, so we can go back in ten years and blow them up again.

 

If you say so (though I think the Kurds would disagree). The al-quedda nutwork is/was a terrorist group for hire, so someone was paying the bills and saddam certainly had the motive.

Anyways, they manufactured tones of WMD and used it one inncoent civilians, the act of a terrorist nation.

 

...Meanwhile nobody cared about North Korea and they produced nuclear weapons, and more importantly, loads of nerve agents.

 

True, and Iran is right behind them. Now if the rest of the world would sober up for a little while and help curb the madness, maybe the world would be a safer place. Probably not, but at least us Yanks wouldn't have to do it all.

 

Saddam gassing the Kurds happened long before there was a "war on terror." And let's not forget that both bin Laden and Saddam were buddies with the US, like Noriega and countless other characters. (Just noting it for the irony...)

 

I posted almost the exact same thing at end of page one. (Got buried by CharlesBHuffin'Fumes)

 

Yeah, times change. Remember when the Germans were our enemy? Back in the first half of the century? Now they're our allies (in the loosest sense of the word)

Remember the Russians? The Cold War? Now, again, we are at "peace" with that nation.

It pisses me off when no-brainers say, "We supplied Iraq with their weapons". Yeah, cause they were supposed to be fighting our enemies, the Iranians. Iraq wasn't our "enemy" at the time.

Like I said, times (like alliances) change.

 

Well, but Poland also was ally of USSR before 1938, but when USSR with Prussia divided it, everybody gave argument that USSR divided its ally or at least a "shield" between itself and Germany. Now all Poland news fuck on and on this topic and blame Russia.

 

Japan is a classic example as well. During WW2 the US and Japan hated each other fervently, and both sides lost countless lives. After Japan surrendered they became an occupied country, same as Iraq is now. For many years the Japanese disliked us, and even fought against us on a civil level. Now 60 years later, they are one of our strongest allies and a freind worth fighting next to.

 

Except the WW2 examples are a bit dated, and even the Cold War one is slightly stale.